MEG: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Magnetoencephalography''' ('''MEG''') is a [[wikipedia:functional neuroimaging|functional neuroimaging]] technique for mapping brain activity by recording [[wikipedia:magnetic field|magnetic field]]s produced by electrical currents occurring naturally in the [[wikipedia:human brain|brain]], using very sensitive [[wikipedia:magnetometer|magnetometer]]s. Arrays of [[wikipedia:SQUID|SQUID]]s (superconducting quantum interference devices) are currently the most common magnetometer. | '''Magnetoencephalography''' ('''MEG''') is a [[wikipedia:functional neuroimaging|functional neuroimaging]] technique for mapping brain activity by recording [[wikipedia:magnetic field|magnetic field]]s produced by electrical currents occurring naturally in the [[wikipedia:human brain|brain]], using very sensitive [[wikipedia:magnetometer|magnetometer]]s. Arrays of [[wikipedia:SQUID|SQUID]]s (superconducting quantum interference devices) are currently the most common magnetometer. | ||
===Motion Correction=== | ===Motion Correction=== | ||
This is less of an issue with MEG than it is with fMRI because head motion is explicitly recorded with HPI coils. Motion correction is part of the initial [http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/meg/Maxfilter Maxfilter] processing which also removes noise from external magnetic fields. | |||
===Dealing with Volume Conduction=== | ===Dealing with Volume Conduction=== | ||
===Wavelet Decomposition=== | Spurious zero-lag correlations stemming from volume conduction are the main obstacle when using MEG data for connectivity analysis. Different solutions have been proposed, for instance the [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20346 Phase Lag Index]. The signal-envelope based approach by [http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3101 Hipp et al. 2012] seems to work well for some. | ||
=== | ===Wavelet Decomposition and Hilbert transform=== | ||
If using R, the ''waveslim'' package provides all the necessary functions. However, if the Hipp method is used, it is more straightforward to simply bandpass the data and apply a [[wikipedia:Hilbert transform|Hilbert transform]] to get the complex valued [[wikipedia:analytic signal|analytic signal]] <math>\hat X(t)</math> with respect to the original signal <math>x(t)</math> by calculating: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
<math> | |||
\hat S(f) = 2 \operatorname{u}(f) S(f) = \left [ 1 + \sgn(f) \right ] S(f) | |||
</math> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
where: | |||
*<math>S(f)</math> is the [[wikipedia:Fourier transform|Fourier transform]] of <math>x(t)</math>, | |||
*<math>\operatorname{u}(f)</math> is the [[wikipedia:Heaviside step function|Heaviside step function]], | |||
*<math>\sgn(f)</math> is the [[wikipedia:sign function|sign function]], | |||
Then the '''analytic signal''' of <math>x(t)</math> is the inverse Fourier transform of <math>\hat S(f)</math>: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
<math> | |||
\hat X(t) = \mathcal{F}^{-1}[\hat S(f)] | |||
</math> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
In this way one obtains both signal envelope and phase which can subsequently be fed into the ''orthogonalized envelope correlation'' <math>{\rm C}_\perp (\hat X,\hat Y)</math> proposed by Hipp: | |||
<blockquote> | |||
<math> | |||
\begin{align} | |||
\hat Y_{\perp^X}(t,f) &=& \Im \left ( \hat Y(t,f)\frac{\hat X^\dagger(t,f)}{|\hat X(t,f)|} \right)\hat e_{\perp^X}(t,f)\\ | |||
{\rm C}_\perp (\hat X,\hat Y;t,f) &=& \frac{{\rm Corr}(|\hat X|,|\hat Y_{\perp^X}|)+{\rm Corr}(|\hat Y|,|\hat X_{\perp^Y}|)}{2} | |||
\end{align} | |||
</math> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
The [http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/meg/CbuMeg CBU Wiki] is the best resource for everything MEG. | The [http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/meg/CbuMeg CBU Wiki] is the best resource for everything MEG. | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 1 April 2016
About MEG
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a functional neuroimaging technique for mapping brain activity by recording magnetic fields produced by electrical currents occurring naturally in the brain, using very sensitive magnetometers. Arrays of SQUIDs (superconducting quantum interference devices) are currently the most common magnetometer.
Motion Correction
This is less of an issue with MEG than it is with fMRI because head motion is explicitly recorded with HPI coils. Motion correction is part of the initial Maxfilter processing which also removes noise from external magnetic fields.
Dealing with Volume Conduction
Spurious zero-lag correlations stemming from volume conduction are the main obstacle when using MEG data for connectivity analysis. Different solutions have been proposed, for instance the Phase Lag Index. The signal-envelope based approach by Hipp et al. 2012 seems to work well for some.
Wavelet Decomposition and Hilbert transform
If using R, the waveslim package provides all the necessary functions. However, if the Hipp method is used, it is more straightforward to simply bandpass the data and apply a Hilbert transform to get the complex valued analytic signal with respect to the original signal by calculating:
where:
- is the Fourier transform of ,
- is the Heaviside step function,
- is the sign function,
Then the analytic signal of is the inverse Fourier transform of :
In this way one obtains both signal envelope and phase which can subsequently be fed into the orthogonalized envelope correlation proposed by Hipp:
See also
The CBU Wiki is the best resource for everything MEG.