|
|
| (100 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| =={{SITENAME}}==
| | [[Image:CrucibleLogo.jpg]] |
|
| |
|
| I have temporarily placed the [[initial advice from sysadmins]] on a separate page.
| | '''''(introduction page - follow this link to the [[:Category:Projects|Directory of {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Projects}} Crucible Projects]])''''' |
|
| |
|
| ==Actual List of Projects== | | ==Crucible Network for Research in Interdisciplinary Design== |
|
| |
|
| Crucible is a network, not an institute. Our approach has been to establish, facilitate and maintain collaboration between academics whose expertise can contribute to the goal of interdisciplinary design research. This has resulted in a matrix of connections: diverse projects, each structured in accordance with the skills and experience of the researchers involved, and a broad range of researchers both inside and outside the University. Crucible involvement has ranged from direct management of local teams to coordination and advisory input on large national and international initiatives. Projects to date include: | | Crucible is a research network that originated in the University of Cambridge in 2001, and has since become the largest organization in the world dedicated to promoting rigorous research collaboration between technologists and researchers in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (AH&SS). The main focus of this collaboration is on design as a meeting point for widely differing research disciplines. Crucible activities include the establishment of new research programmes, training of researchers, input to policy bodies, and identification of suitable funding sources for research in interdisciplinary design. Crucible provides both a scientific and organisational framework for this research. |
|
| |
|
| * Measuring the [[business value of social networking]] http://www.cam.ac.uk/proxyresearch/features/the-business-of-social-networking/
| | Why the name? The crucible has always been a melting pot for valuable materials, the origin of new alloys, materials of innovation. We believe that the post-industrial crucible must be a place where knowledge and ideas are blended and tempered. |
|
| |
|
| * A project examining how people, young and old, at home and at work are using communications today in the US, UK, China and Australia. It is designed to provide analytic value and insight for planning future generations of retail communications services.
| | ==[[:Category:People|Crucible Network Members]]== |
|
| |
|
| * How is the nature of the university changing, and being challenged by, ICT? The Cambridge Digital Humanities Initiative is coordinated by CRASSH, with representatives from CARET, Crucible, and the Cambridge University Library.
| | One of the long term goals of Crucible is to support the creation of an international network of researchers and educators having shared interests. The focus of this network is on collaboration between technologists and arts, humanities and social science researchers, leading to reflective research in interdisciplinary design. |
|
| |
|
| * Investigating agency and intent in the experience of designed interaction, taking perspectives from psychiatry, consumer research and artificial intelligence.
| | Crucible coordination activities are currently carried out by [[Alan Blackwell]] (Computer Laboratory), [[David Good]] (Dept of Psychology) and [[Nathan Crilly]] (Engineering Design Centre). |
|
| |
|
| * [[Bridging the Global Digital Divide]]
| | Core contributors to the overall Crucible agenda have included [[Rachel Hewson]], [[James Leach]] and [[Lee Wilson]] |
|
| |
|
| * talks.cam, a pioneering initiative encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration through improved awareness of related research throughout Cambridge. (It includes, of course, a series of debates and seminars on interdisciplinary design).
| | An overview of academic disciplines can be seen in a list of [[Crucible Network Members]] grouped by Cambridge department. |
|
| |
|
| * From Creators and Critics to Communities. How are digital technologies changing the landscape of engagement between high-profile creative artists and their audiences?
| | A complete list of {{PAGESINCATEGORY:People}} participants in the Crucible network can be found on the page [[:Category:People]], along with a separate list of {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Advisors}} advisors: [[:Category:Advisors]] (see also [[:Category:Students]] and [[:Category:Clients]]). |
|
| |
|
| * Encouraging people to monitor and compare their energy consumption, through www.readyourmeter.org
| | ==[[:Category:Projects|Collaborative Projects]]== |
|
| |
|
| * New ICTs, civil society and bottom-up governance in the developing world is an inaugural research project of a multi-disciplinary Centre of Governance and Human Rights in Cambridge.
| | Crucible is a network, not an institute. Our approach has been to establish, facilitate and maintain collaboration between academics whose expertise can contribute to the goal of interdisciplinary design research. This has resulted in a matrix of connections: diverse projects, each structured in accordance with the skills and experience of the researchers involved, and a broad range of researchers both inside and outside the University. Crucible involvement has ranged from direct management of local teams to coordination and advisory input on large national and international initiatives. |
|
| |
|
| * Coded Chimera: exploring relationships between sculptural form making and biological morphogenesis through computer modelling.
| | A full list of {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Projects}} Crucible collaborations can be viewed here: [[:Category:Projects]] |
|
| |
|
| * An interactive model for analysing alternative-popular folk music with a research-based web community database
| | We have grouped projects into a number of over-arching themes: [[:Category:Themes]] |
|
| |
|
| * When technology researchers involve the broader public in their work, novel ethical issues arise - often completely unlike those of medical and biological research that guide public policy. This interdisciplinary team is constructing a guide for research with human participants in technology design and management.
| | ==Events and Programmes== |
|
| |
|
| * The Flagship Retrofit project is trialling ways in which public housing stock in the UK can be modified in ways that reduce energy usage through a combination of design interventions and behaviour change.
| | Public engagement with the Crucible agenda is extended via a substantial programme of interdisciplinary seminars and conferences. |
|
| | |
| * Computer programming is usually done in private, and very carefully. Live coding is a kind of musical performance where programs are written on stage, in front of an audience. Improcess is creating new tools for music programming.
| | * Interdisciplinary design debates and seminars: http://talks.cam.ac.uk/show/index/6013 |
|
| | * [[HCI theory group]] |
| * As part of the UK New Dynamics of Ageing programme, a group of projects are investigating Age and Meaning, starting from research perspectives in the arts and humanities.
| | * [[Collaboration and Ownership in the Digital Economy]] |
|
| | * [[Digital Resources in the Humanities and Arts]] |
| * How are objects and their meanings connected? Artefacts of Encounter is an investigation of cultural treasures, the museums where they are shown to the public, and the different communities of scholars and public who engage with them via technology.
| | * [[Subversion, Conversion and Development]] |
|
| | * Cambridge [[Festival of Interactive Technology]] |
| * New 21st Century Cities is an initiative spanning technology research, public policy, urban planning and social science, to understand how we are building new cities, settlements and communities in locations such as Media City UK.
| | * [[Humanities in the European Research Area]] |
|
| | * [[Evidence of Value: ICT in Arts and Humanities]] |
| * How can design play a useful role in early stage scientific research? The Design in Science project at the Institute for Manufacturing is conducting a series of practical experiments working with a wide variety of Cambridge departments. | | * See also the range of [[:Category:Arts productions]] in which Crucible research has been presented to the public |
|
| |
| * What does it mean to be a computer 'virtuoso'? By studying expert musicians who use computers, in collaboration with the Centre for Music and Science, we can develop new understanding of human experiences with technology.
| |
|
| |
| * The World Health Organisation is working with Crucible members to improve local response to outbreaks of new viral diseases such as Ebola. The challenge is to integrate field workers into a global research community, while empowering them to customise procedures and technical infrastructure to local conditions.
| |
|
| |
| * How are visual "roadmaps" integrated into the practices of strategic management? The study of this widespread phenomenon integrates questions of graphic design, small group collaboration, communication studies and organisational management. | |
|
| |
| * The Choreographic Language Agent project is developing an intelligent tool for dance-makers that will broaden understanding of the unique blend of physical and mental processes that constitute dance and choreography. | |
|
| |
| * Funded practice-based research workshops on collaborative performance technologies (with Anglia Ruskin University and CRASSH) and Museums of the Future (with the Fitzwilliam Museum and Cambridge Architecture faculty).
| |
|
| |
| * Cambridge undergraduates study one subject, and do that very thoroughly. In a university with no "minor" options, how do students build interdisciplinary skills? One way is to spend the summer pursuing undergraduate research opportunities in other departments.
| |
|
| |
| * As participants in the EPSRC Creator cluster, Crucible members are investigating New Research Processes and Business Models for the Creative Industries.
| |
|
| |
| * Working with 20 senior designers in fields including architecture, aircraft, automobiles, fashion, medical devices and websites, to determine the processes and structures that represent best practice across design, coordinated by the Engineering Design Centre; | |
|
| |
| * Does interdisciplinarity lead to innovation? Many influential people believe it does, but on what evidence?. This NESTA-funded project at CRASSH compiled a guide to research policy and best practice in interdisciplinary innovation. | |
|
| |
| * Engineers, psychologists and musicologists are working to inform the art of violin-making, by constructing Virtual Violins to understand the relationship between the acoustic properties of the instrument and human perception of musical sound. | |
|
| |
| * The Distributed Working Project, which aims to establish new ways of analysing and developing distributed teams and workgroups by bringing together theories of human communication, the sociology of work and workplace design; | |
|
| |
| * Educational applications of physically-embedded computing to the world wide web, as a member of the European WEBKIT project;
| |
|
| |
| * Choreography and cognition: Two choreographers, ten dancers, six psychologists and neuroscientists, a film-maker and an anthropologist working together to discover the cognitive grounding of movement and choreographic practice at Random Dance Company.
| |
|
| |
| * Aidworld, a charity working with computer science and humanitarian relief and development specialists, building software for ultra-low bandwidth Internet access in developing countries | |
|
| |
| * National and international policy conferences on topics such as Collaboration and Ownership in the Digital Economy and Evidence of Value: ICT in Arts and Humanities;
| |
|
| |
| * Performance interfaces, notations and live music programming. Laptop music performers (Nick Collins), music technology developers (Chris Nash) and electro-acoustic composers (Alejandro Viñao) are working on the boundary of computer science and the music, with the Centre for Music and Science. | |
|
| |
| * People with Alzheimer's have increasing difficulty in communicating as the disease progresses, even with members of their own family. Lorisa Dubuc is working with public health professionals and community volunteers to investigate whether modern communication devices can assist communication by those with the disease -- even among people in the same house.
| |
|
| |
| * Social property and new social forms: prerequisites for creative and interdisciplinary collaboration, investigated through colloquia and interdisciplinary design workshops;
| |
|
| |
| * What happens when paper charts disappear from a hospital ward? The intensive care unit at Papworth Hospital implemented a fully digital bedside record system, under the gaze of a variety of social scientists and information systems experts. The results led to publications in both clinical medicine and technology research, contributing to future best practice.
| |
|
| |
| * An interdisciplinary design collaboration with drug discovery company ArQule, investigating design tools for new organisational models of drug discovery;
| |
|
| |
| * Development of socially-aware computing technologies for use in a fine arts context by multimedia artist Alexa Wright;
| |
|
| |
| * Investigating the conditions in the built environment that lead to innovation communities, using a novel approach to architectural ethnography;
| |
|
| |
| * An interdisciplinary design collaboration with Microsoft Research, investigating patterns and contexts of web usage in local government;
| |
|
| |
| * Technical support for the multimedia staging in London of a suppressed 1930s opera, Maschinist Hopkins;
| |
|
| |
| * Assessment of query mechanisms for use in mobile web browsers on handheld devices.
| |
|
| |
| * Work meets life: an integrative study of work in living systems, including scientists in biology, zoology, physiology and medicine together with perspectives from aerospace, business and engineering.
| |
|
| |
| * What is the nature of innovation in the cultural sector? This policy project, working with the Arts Council of England, DCMS/Living East, AHRC and CRASSH, investigates whether information and communication technologies can support the creation of value out of arts and humanities research.
| |
|
| |
| * A study of the role of gender in free/libre and open source software, funded by the European Commission, and leading to a policy report and recommendations on gender in open source.
| |
|
| |
| * Building architectural artworks from "smart" materials with Simon Biggs and Eugene Terentjev;
| |
|
| |
| * An experimental programme to explore and evaluate modes of collaboration between artists and technologists through New Technology Arts Fellowships;
| |
|
| |
| * Evaluation of remote collaboration in a distributed design studio, working with the Martin Centre for architectural research and the MIT Urban Design Studio;
| |
|
| |
| * Human factors and evaluation methodology for Dasher, a hands-free text entry sytem (results recently described in Nature and by the BBC ).
| |
(introduction page - follow this link to the Directory of 195 Crucible Projects)
Crucible Network for Research in Interdisciplinary Design
Crucible is a research network that originated in the University of Cambridge in 2001, and has since become the largest organization in the world dedicated to promoting rigorous research collaboration between technologists and researchers in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (AH&SS). The main focus of this collaboration is on design as a meeting point for widely differing research disciplines. Crucible activities include the establishment of new research programmes, training of researchers, input to policy bodies, and identification of suitable funding sources for research in interdisciplinary design. Crucible provides both a scientific and organisational framework for this research.
Why the name? The crucible has always been a melting pot for valuable materials, the origin of new alloys, materials of innovation. We believe that the post-industrial crucible must be a place where knowledge and ideas are blended and tempered.
One of the long term goals of Crucible is to support the creation of an international network of researchers and educators having shared interests. The focus of this network is on collaboration between technologists and arts, humanities and social science researchers, leading to reflective research in interdisciplinary design.
Crucible coordination activities are currently carried out by Alan Blackwell (Computer Laboratory), David Good (Dept of Psychology) and Nathan Crilly (Engineering Design Centre).
Core contributors to the overall Crucible agenda have included Rachel Hewson, James Leach and Lee Wilson
An overview of academic disciplines can be seen in a list of Crucible Network Members grouped by Cambridge department.
A complete list of 281 participants in the Crucible network can be found on the page Category:People, along with a separate list of 194 advisors: Category:Advisors (see also Category:Students and Category:Clients).
Crucible is a network, not an institute. Our approach has been to establish, facilitate and maintain collaboration between academics whose expertise can contribute to the goal of interdisciplinary design research. This has resulted in a matrix of connections: diverse projects, each structured in accordance with the skills and experience of the researchers involved, and a broad range of researchers both inside and outside the University. Crucible involvement has ranged from direct management of local teams to coordination and advisory input on large national and international initiatives.
A full list of 195 Crucible collaborations can be viewed here: Category:Projects
We have grouped projects into a number of over-arching themes: Category:Themes
Events and Programmes
Public engagement with the Crucible agenda is extended via a substantial programme of interdisciplinary seminars and conferences.
