LawBot: Difference between revisions
From Computer Laboratory Group Design Projects
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Potential alternative to LexSnap proposal Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Potential alternative to [[ | Potential alternative to [[Lexsnap]] proposal | ||
Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time. | Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time. | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 12 October 2018
Potential alternative to Lexsnap proposal
Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time.
