Cambridge University Press: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Science for AD2500 | Science for AD2500 | ||
Everyone knows that peer-reviewed publication is the gold standard for scientific facts. But it is too slow for the Millennial generation, who prefer fast "facts" from Facebook likes, GitHub pull requests, up-votes, blog comments or TED talks. We need a new model for science that is agile and open, but also solid enough to last another 500 years. Your task is to prototype the next Royal Society or Cambridge University Press, providing democratic public access for Millenials, rapid quality control that would satisfy the next Isaac Newton, and permanent paper archives to survive the Apocalypse of 2499. Don't forget the essential academic attributes of date, author, and citation mechanisms. | Everyone knows that peer-reviewed publication is the gold standard for scientific facts. But it is too slow for the Millennial generation, who prefer fast "facts" from Facebook likes, GitHub pull requests, up-votes, blog comments or TED talks. We need a new model for science that is agile and open, but also solid enough to last another 500 years. Your task is to prototype the next Royal Society or Cambridge University Press, providing democratic public access for Millenials, rapid quality control that would satisfy the next Isaac Newton, and PDF for permanent paper archives to survive the Apocalypse of 2499. Elegance and attention to detail are critical on both paper and screen - if it looks like Buzzfeed, nobody will believe is it the Transactions of the Royal Society. Don't forget the essential academic attributes of date, author, and citation mechanisms. | ||
Revision as of 06:26, 21 October 2016
Contact: Jennifer Wright <jwright@cambridge.org>
First draft:
Science for AD2500
Everyone knows that peer-reviewed publication is the gold standard for scientific facts. But it is too slow for the Millennial generation, who prefer fast "facts" from Facebook likes, GitHub pull requests, up-votes, blog comments or TED talks. We need a new model for science that is agile and open, but also solid enough to last another 500 years. Your task is to prototype the next Royal Society or Cambridge University Press, providing democratic public access for Millenials, rapid quality control that would satisfy the next Isaac Newton, and PDF for permanent paper archives to survive the Apocalypse of 2499. Elegance and attention to detail are critical on both paper and screen - if it looks like Buzzfeed, nobody will believe is it the Transactions of the Royal Society. Don't forget the essential academic attributes of date, author, and citation mechanisms.
