LawBot: Difference between revisions

From Computer Laboratory Group Design Projects
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Potential alternative to [[Lexsnap]] proposal
Client: Tetiana Bersheda, [[Lexsnap]] <tetiana@lexsnap.com>
 
Client: Tetiana Bersheda <tetiana@lexsnap.com>


Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time.
Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time.

Latest revision as of 17:34, 13 October 2018

Client: Tetiana Bersheda, Lexsnap <tetiana@lexsnap.com>

Many people don't know where to start when they have legal problems, but lawyers are expensive. Would it be possible to combine standard approaches such as crowd-sourcing, wikis or forums with the free (but much too technical) online content available on sites like legislation.gov.uk? Your task is to create a system that works at first like a chatbot, but helps users to paraphrase and interpret both their own questions and pieces of actual legislation, so that the chatbot gets smarter over time.