Heterodox Economic Modeller: Difference between revisions

From Computer Laboratory Group Design Projects
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Christopher Newfield, ISRF <chris.newfield@isrf.org>
Christopher Newfield, Independent Social Research Foundation <chris.newfield@isrf.org>


There is a long history of financial simulators that can be used to model national economies, dating back to the water-powered “Phillips machine” (we have one in Cambridge). Today’s economy is stuck in a rut, because alternative economic theories are proposed by people whose mathematical models are simply less well embedded than the legacy implementations. Your task is to create a quick and dirty financial simulator that could be used by heterodox economists to propose and debate serious alternatives to outdated government and corporate policies.
There is a long history of financial simulators that can be used to model national economies, dating back to the water-powered “Phillips machine” (we have one in Cambridge). Today’s economy is stuck in a rut, because alternative economic theories are proposed by people whose mathematical models are simply less well embedded than the legacy implementations. Your task is to create a quick and dirty financial simulator that could be used by heterodox economists to propose and debate serious alternatives to outdated government and corporate policies.

Latest revision as of 09:24, 2 October 2023

Christopher Newfield, Independent Social Research Foundation <chris.newfield@isrf.org>

There is a long history of financial simulators that can be used to model national economies, dating back to the water-powered “Phillips machine” (we have one in Cambridge). Today’s economy is stuck in a rut, because alternative economic theories are proposed by people whose mathematical models are simply less well embedded than the legacy implementations. Your task is to create a quick and dirty financial simulator that could be used by heterodox economists to propose and debate serious alternatives to outdated government and corporate policies.