Northwest Cambridge: Difference between revisions
From West Cambridge Active Travel (WCAT)
Jump to navigationJump to search
(northwest cambridge documents) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Documents related active travel in Northwest Cambridge == | == Documents related to active travel in Northwest Cambridge == | ||
* [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=MTKQMJDX01700 Planning application site] | * [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=MTKQMJDX01700 Planning application site] | ||
** [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/files/5D7E050AEB1A56AB02CFF84A9DA2FFCD/pdf/13_1401_REM-AMENDED_DESIGN_AND_ACCESS_STATEMENT-1352123.pdf Design & Access Statement] | ** [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/files/5D7E050AEB1A56AB02CFF84A9DA2FFCD/pdf/13_1401_REM-AMENDED_DESIGN_AND_ACCESS_STATEMENT-1352123.pdf Design & Access Statement] | ||
** [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/files/6E096C7F654612650C3D2615CF451D2B/pdf/13_1401_REM-AMENDED_TRANSPORT_STATEMENT-1352136.pdf Transport Statement] | ** [https://idox.cambridge.gov.uk/online-applications/files/6E096C7F654612650C3D2615CF451D2B/pdf/13_1401_REM-AMENDED_TRANSPORT_STATEMENT-1352136.pdf Transport Statement] | ||
*** Appendix A shows proposed bus routes -- | *** Appendix A shows proposed bus routes -- these are highly questionable, involving a major detour of the Citi 5 route that will be unpopular with existing users of that route. | ||
*** Table 5.1 shows a design typology for primary streets involving 2.0 metre cycle lanes. These are considered substandard for new-build streets, where 2.1 metre is expected minimum, and 2.5 metre optimum (for uni-directional lanes). Having said that, the main issue is ground clearance to ensure that there are no dangerous obstacles to collide with at pedal-height. With 2.0 metre cycle lanes, ground clearance could be provided by a buffer of short grass between the cycle lane and any obstruction, for example. | *** Table 5.1 shows a design typology for primary streets involving 2.0 metre cycle lanes. These are considered substandard for new-build streets, where 2.1 metre is expected minimum, and 2.5 metre optimum (for uni-directional lanes). Having said that, the main issue is ground clearance to ensure that there are no dangerous obstacles to collide with at pedal-height. With 2.0 metre cycle lanes, ground clearance could be provided by a buffer of short grass between the cycle lane and any obstruction, for example. | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 23 January 2017
- Planning application site
- Design & Access Statement
- Transport Statement
- Appendix A shows proposed bus routes -- these are highly questionable, involving a major detour of the Citi 5 route that will be unpopular with existing users of that route.
- Table 5.1 shows a design typology for primary streets involving 2.0 metre cycle lanes. These are considered substandard for new-build streets, where 2.1 metre is expected minimum, and 2.5 metre optimum (for uni-directional lanes). Having said that, the main issue is ground clearance to ensure that there are no dangerous obstacles to collide with at pedal-height. With 2.0 metre cycle lanes, ground clearance could be provided by a buffer of short grass between the cycle lane and any obstruction, for example.
