Raven-enabled applications: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Details of applications that have or could be adapted to use Raven, via either the Ucam-Webauth protocol or Shibboleth. Note that this list is bound to be incomplete - before doing significant work on something not listed here (or perhaps even on something that is) it might be worth asking on the cs-raven-discuss@lists.cam.ac.uk mailing list and/or public Shibboleth support lists. | Details of applications that have or could be adapted to use Raven, via either the Ucam-Webauth protocol or Shibboleth. Note that this list is bound to be incomplete - before doing significant work on something not listed here (or perhaps even on something that is) it might be worth asking on the cs-raven-discuss@lists.cam.ac.uk mailing list and/or public Shibboleth support lists. | ||
Details of support for 'competing' technologies are included since they often provide useful hints about how Raven support could be implemented. | Just because there is something listed under 'Ucam WebAuth' or 'Shibboleth' doesn't imply that support for these protocols exists or is known to be working! Details of support for 'competing' technologies are included since they often provide useful hints about how Raven support could be implemented. | ||
<table border="1" cellpadding="5"> | <table border="1" cellpadding="5"> | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 19 March 2008
Warning: under redevelopment.
Details of applications that have or could be adapted to use Raven, via either the Ucam-Webauth protocol or Shibboleth. Note that this list is bound to be incomplete - before doing significant work on something not listed here (or perhaps even on something that is) it might be worth asking on the cs-raven-discuss@lists.cam.ac.uk mailing list and/or public Shibboleth support lists.
Just because there is something listed under 'Ucam WebAuth' or 'Shibboleth' doesn't imply that support for these protocols exists or is known to be working! Details of support for 'competing' technologies are included since they often provide useful hints about how Raven support could be implemented.
| Software | Raven | Related SSO technologies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ucam WebAuth | Shibboleth | OpenID | Pubcookie | CAS | Stanford WebAuth | |
| CourseWork | 1 | |||||
| Mailman | 1 | 1 | ||||
| MediaWiki | 1 | |||||
| MoinMoin | 1 | |||||
| MRBS | 1 | |||||
| Nagios | 1 | |||||
| NoCat | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Oracle SSO | 1 | [2] | ||||
| PeopleSoft's PeopleTools | 1 | |||||
| PhpBB | 1 | |||||
| PHP Wiki | 1 | |||||
| RT | 1 | |||||
| Sakai | 1 | |||||
| Soks wiki | 1 | |||||
| Twiki | 1 | |||||
Custom Raven applications
Applications written directly to use Raven:
- CamCORS
- Room Booking
- WebNAG, a Raven-based replacement for NoCat
- Lapnet, a locally written captive portal (wired only atm!)
